In comparison, this is the more recent shot. Both were agency jobs, so both paid the same… but the latter shot looks more “expensive” I think.
So… what has changed?
First up, I am approaching my interiors more like a landscape photographer now that I am more comfortable with the genre and what is being asked of me - so I am looking for lines, placing features in strategic locations in the frame where I can and making sure that the angles just “look right”! Now, I do like an oblique shot to convey space, bit slightly off dead on is not a good look, so now I will generally shoot dead straight with horizontal horizontals and vertical verticals when going with this kind of angle. I will usually try and get at least one oblique “corner to corner” shot per room too, usually more, but sometimes there just isn’t a composition there to be had!
The other big change is that the first one was as prescribed - single frame, shot with flash. Wham bam thank you mam type photography… and it sucks. The flash kills the atmosphere, kills the natural light and makes the room look flat. These days, even though I am not being paid to go to these lengths, everything is shot natural light and often using HDR techniques. The result is a more more natural looking photograph which is more three dimensional and, to be honest, just more inviting. It also looks way more expensive… because it should be!
So… looking at the obliques next, here is an old shot from the same house: